Arizona Game and FIsh Department - Managing Today for Wildlife Tomorrow: azgfd.gov Arizona Game and Fish Department
  

Phone Number
BUY LICENSES | BIG GAME DRAW | eNEWS | CALENDAR | VIDEO | HUNTING | FISHING | WILDLIFE VIEWING | CONSERVATION | EDUCATION | BOATING | SHOOTING | OHV | SITE MAP | EMPLOYMENT
 
AZGFD Home
expand icon eServices
expanded icon Newsroom
expand icon Hunting & Fishing
   
Hunting

Fishing

-
- Sport Fish Species
- Where to Fish
- Community Fishing
- Weekly Fishing Report
- Lake Levels/River Flow
- Stocking Schedule
- Fish Consumption Advisories
- State Records
- Big Fish-of-the-Year
- Hatcheries
Resources
expand icon Outdoor Recreation
expand icon Wildlife & Conservation
expand icon Education & Outreach
expand icon Inside AZGFD
Customer Service
 
Rotenone Review Advisory Committee Final Report
 

Advisory panel affirms: Strict Game and Fish procedures assure that rotenone is a safe, effective fisheries management tool
Game and Fish Director approves final report and process improvement recommendations

PHOENIX – A blue-ribbon committee that extensively studied the use of rotenone in Arizona has reaffirmed the Arizona Game and Fish Department’s belief that rotenone is an important fisheries management tool that can be used safely and effectively.

Rotenone is a piscicide (a pesticide used to kill undesired fish) that is used in limited applications to assist native fish and aquatic species recovery or aquatic invasive species control.

The report and recommendations from the Rotenone Review Advisory Committee were accepted and approved on Jan. 9, 2012 by Game and Fish Director Larry Voyles. 

  • Piscicide Treatment Planning and Procedures Manual for Fossil Creek
    • Environmental Analysis

  Fossil Creek Watershed Treatment Plan

  Fossil Creek Watershed Treatment Plan signature page

 Rotenone Review Advisory Committee Final Report

 Appendix 1 AZGFD Environmental Assessment Checklist

  Appendix 2 US Forest Service Environmental Assessment and FONSI

  Appendix 3 Stage 1 Decision Paper Fossil Creek with signatures

  Appendix 4 Preliminary Treatment Plan Fossil Creek Final with signatures

  Appendix 4a Stage 2 Decision Paper Fossil Creek with signatures

  Appendix 4b Preliminary Treatment Plan Fossil Creek Final

  Appendix 5 Fossil Creek Public Involvement Plan with signatures

  Appendix 6 Fossil Creek Public Meeting Briefing Final with signatures

  Appendix 7 Piscicide Labels and MSDS

  Appendix 8 AGFD Piscicide Treatment Planning and Procedures Manual

  Appendix 9 OSHA Respirator Questionnaire

  Appendix 10 Helicopter Aviation Safety Plan

  Appendix 11 Rotenone FAQ Handout

  Appendix 12 USFS Environmental Assessment Section 18 Review of Rotenone

  Appendix 13 USFWS Biological Opinion for Use of Rotenone in Fossil

Creek Watershed

  Appendix 14 USFS Pesticide Use Plan

  Appendix 15 ADEQ Notice of Intent

  Appendix 16 ADEQ Approved Pesticide Discharge and Management Plan

  Appendix 17 Aviation Procedure Safety Plan Fossil Creek

  Appendix 18 ARS Title 17-481 Application of Aquatic Poisons

  Appendix 19 Fossil Creek Watershed Treatment Plan Soldier Mesa Tank

Treatment Plan

 

“The committee provided insightful analysis and a number of recommendations regarding the department’s piscicide application procedures,” said Voyles. “The results show once again that processes can always be improved by careful evaluation and input from experts in different fields. We’ve just made processes and procedures that were very good even better.”

Voyles added that in addition to the committee recommendations, and after taking into careful consideration the recommendations by the Arizona Farm Bureau, “I have directed this agency to meet the standards of the National Environmental Policy Act for all piscicide applications.”       

The use of rotenone as a piscicide prompted concerns last year by some constituents over perceptions of potential environmental or human health impacts from exposure. The concerns resulted in proposed state legislation—SB1294 and HB2114—that would have virtually eliminated the Arizona Game and Fish Department’s ability to use rotenone in the future. The legislation did not pass last session.

To thoroughly study the issue and address constituent concerns, Voyles temporarily halted the Game and Fish Department’s use of rotenone in Arizona and in June authorized the formation of the Rotenone Review Advisory Committee to analyze and make recommendations on the use of rotenone and other piscicides for Arizona fisheries and aquatic wildlife management. 

The committee and its composite subcommittees reviewed the best available scientific reports and research, gathered input from other experts, and provided technical expertise, opinion, and analysis regarding the use of rotenone and other piscicides, focusing on the following subject areas: (1) state/federal regulations, internal policy, public involvement, and best management practices; (2) human health and the environment; (3) alternate management strategies; and (4) recreational, economic and social impacts.

The committee presented its final recommendations to the director in November, and the final report in late December. Among the recommendations, many of which are already in practice by Game and Fish, are:

  • Modify policies and procedures for the planning and implementation of rotenone piscicide projects in Arizona in accordance with the latest accepted standards and regulations, which minimize potential environmental impacts and avoid impacts to human health and drinking water supplies.

  • Include a robust public engagement process by developing a public awareness or involvement plan during planning and implementation of each piscicide project.

  • Develop a project-specific operating protocol when there is a known or suspected direct connection with groundwater wells and rotenone-treated water within the project area.

  • Ensure appropriate training for handling and applying rotenone to minimize human and non-target species exposure.

  • Monitor scientific literature to ensure policies and practices take into account any advances in science and knowledge.

  • Recognize the recreation, economic and social value of having rotenone as a tool to manage fish populations, and have the ability to use rotenone in a manner consistent with the latest Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approved application procedures.

One of the concerns the committee examined was whether there was an association between rotenone exposure and Parkinson’s disease, in light of some recent studies that received media coverage.

The committee found that, to date, there are no published studies that conclusively link exposure to rotenone and the development of clinically diagnosed Parkinson’s disease. It found that the studies using animal models and pesticides to investigate the pathway of Parkinson’s disease are limited in scope because they do not produce the actual disease state, and they model only the motor features of the disease. Further, they used very high doses of rotenone administered to rodents mostly through tissue injection over long time periods—methods not relevant to realistic human exposure.

Other studies focused on rotenone use as an insecticide in the agricultural field, primarily applied by farmers. None of the studies identify risks from the application methods (insecticide or piscicide), or address the differences in rotenone concentrations that vary with application methods. Very small concentrations of rotenone are used in fish management in accordance with EPA-required protocols.

Piscicidal use of rotenone as a restricted-use pesticide degrades quickly, has never been shown to contaminate groundwater without a direct connection to the treated surface water, and restricts human exposure of the treatment area during treatment, all of which make an environmental exposure to rotenone highly unlikely to cause Parkinson’s disease or Parkinson’s-like symptoms in humans.

A detailed examination of this and other human health and environmental aspects are included within the committee’s report.

Participating members of the committee included representatives from the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, Arizona Department of Health Services, Arizona Department of Water Resources, Arizona Department of Agriculture, Arizona Game and Fish Department, Arizona House of Representatives, Arizona Senate, Arizona State University, Central Arizona Project, City of Phoenix, Salt River Project, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Forest Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Bureau of Land Management, Arizona Farm Bureau, Arizona Wildlife Federation, Trout Unlimited, R and R Partners, Shuler Law Firm, Town of Patagonia, and the Institute for Environmental Conflict Resolution.

Background on rotenone

Rotenone is a naturally occurring substance derived from the roots of tropical plants in the bean and pea family that are primarily found in Malaysia, South America, and East Africa. People have used rotenone for centuries to capture fish for food in areas where these plants are naturally found, and it has been used in fisheries management as a piscicide (a pesticide used to kill undesired fish) in North America since the 1930s. Rotenone was originally registered in the U.S. in 1947 for use in agriculture and as a piscicide. It was reregistered by EPA in 2007 for piscicide use after an extensive review of human and environmental safety.

Rotenone is an important tool for removing competing and predatory non-native fish from small, targeted recovery areas so that native fish or frogs (including threatened and endangered species) can be restored. Use of this tool is important to the state’s native and threatened/endangered species conservation efforts, which help ensure multiple uses of land as well as continued sport fishing opportunities and their associated economic benefits to the state. Rotenone is also used to control invasive species that can cause environmental and economic harm.

Rotenone does not persist long in the environment. Because it degrades rapidly, it disappears from streams quickly and does not penetrate well through soil, and therefore does not pose a threat to groundwater. In fact, short- and long-term monitoring studies following rotenone treatments have never detected rotenone in groundwater wells that have no direct connection to rotenone-treated surface water.  

Humans and mammals are not affected by the small concentrations of rotenone used in fish removal projects. There are no known health impacts to humans when rotenone is used according to directions on the EPA-approved rotenone product labels.

 
 
Related AZGFD Info
- Watercraft
- Sport Fishing Education
- Economic Impact
- Sign up for AZGFD eNews
- Wildlife Photo Gallery
 


Hunting, Trapping & Fishing Regulations, Season Dates & Draw Information

Detailed information on all rules, regulations and seasons

  • 2014-2015 Arizona Hunting Regulations [PDF, 6mb]

  • Hunt Permit-Tag Application Form [PDF]
  • 2014 Antelope & Elk Hunt Draw Regulations
    [PDF, 4mb]

  • 2014 Spring Hunt Draw Regulations [PDF]

  • New! 2014-2015 Waterfowl & Snipe Regulations [PDF]

  • New! 2014-2015 Dove & Band-tailed Pigeon Regs [PDF]

  • 2014 Sandhill Crane Regulations [PDF]

  • Hunt Arizona 2012: Survey, Harvest and Draw Data
    [PDF, 6mb]

  • 2013-2014 Trapping Regulations [PDF]


  • 2014 AZ Fishing Regulations
    [PDF, 7mb]
  • 2014 Urban Fishing Guidebook
    [PDF, 9mb]
  • 2014 Amphibian and Reptile Regulations [PDF]

  • 2013-14 Raptor Regulations [PDF]
  • Arizona Residency Requirements [PDF]
 

Mission | Frequently Asked Questions | Web Policy | Send Comments | Employment | Commission Agenda | Office Locations | Site Map | Search | © 2013 AZGFD